Newby v. Newby

275 S.W.2d 779
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
DecidedFebruary 18, 1955
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 275 S.W.2d 779 (Newby v. Newby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newby v. Newby, 275 S.W.2d 779 (Ky. 1955).

Opinion

WADDILL, Commissioner.

The appellant, Seldon Newby, was granted an absolute divorce from appellee, Minerva Newby, on January 6, 1954. In the judgment Mr. Newby was awarded the custody of Doris, age 16, and Charles, age 14. The custody of Ellen, age 11, and Janice, age 3, was given to Mrs. Newby.

On February 13, 1954, Mr. Newby petitioned the court to grant him the custody of Ellen and Janice. . After a hearing, this motion was overruled, and an order was entered continuing the custody of these two children with Mrs. Newby. This appeal is prosecuted from that order.

The chief concern of courts in this character of case is the welfare of the children. Where children of tender years are involved, courts ordinarily will not deprive the mother of their custody, unless it clearly appears that she is not a fit person to have the children. Hager v. Hager, 309 Ky. 803, 219 S.W.2d 10; Price v. Price, 306 Ky. 214, 206 S.W.2d 924; Wills v. Wills, 168 Ky. 35, 181 S.W. 619.

We find no evidence in this record that appellee is of bad moral character, or is otherwise unfit to rear her children'. ' The only evidence showing a change of condi-

*780 tion since the original' custody order was -entered, is that appellee has married Thomas Guy, and that they have moved to South Portsmouth to seek employment. However, there is no evidence that the welfare of the children is being neglected.

In awarding custody of children in a divorce action a wide discretion must be given to the Chancellor, and it is only where this discretion has been abused that this Court will interfere with his decision. Price v. Price, 306 Ky. 214, 206 S.W.2d 924. Under this record we do not entertain any doubt as to the correctness of the Chancellor’s decision.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Enlow v. Enlow
456 S.W.2d 688 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1970)
Gernert v. Gernert
457 S.W.2d 831 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1970)
Smith v. Smith
429 S.W.2d 387 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1968)
Stillwell v. Stillwell
420 S.W.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1967)
Rudd v. Rudd
419 S.W.2d 573 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1967)
Gates v. Gates
412 S.W.2d 223 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1967)
Chastain v. Chastain
405 S.W.2d 758 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1966)
McCormick v. Lewis
328 S.W.2d 415 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1959)
Somerville v. Somerville
306 S.W.2d 301 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1957)
Renfro v. Renfro
291 S.W.2d 46 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1956)
Hicks v. Hicks
290 S.W.2d 483 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1956)
Garner v. Garner
282 S.W.2d 850 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 S.W.2d 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newby-v-newby-kyctapphigh-1955.