Newby, Kwamae Ladon
This text of Newby, Kwamae Ladon (Newby, Kwamae Ladon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-93,754-01
EX PARTE KWAMAE LADON NEWBY, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W17-75404-K(A) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT # 4 FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery and was sentenced to thirty years’
imprisonment. Applicant did not appeal his conviction. Applicant filed this application for a writ
of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See
TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary because trial counsel
failed to investigate his background and incorrectly advised him on his ability to be placed on
community supervision. Further, Applicant alleges that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to
file a motion for new trial and for failing to file a notice of appeal. Applicant has alleged facts that,
if true, might entitle him to relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 2
S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court
is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial
court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. Trial counsel’s response should
include whether Applicant requested trial counsel file a motion for new trial and notice of appeal,
whether trial counsel investigated Applicant’s background, and what trial counsel told Applicant
regarding his ability to be placed on community supervision. In developing the record, the trial court
may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall
determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by
counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM .
PROC . art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this
Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s
plea was involuntary and whether trial counsel’s performance was deficient. The trial court may
make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: June 22, 2022 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Newby, Kwamae Ladon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newby-kwamae-ladon-texcrimapp-2022.