Newbury v. Lawrence
134 A. 918, 103 N.J.L. 199, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 289
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Newbury v. Lawrence, 134 A. 918, 103 N.J.L. 199, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 289 (N.J. 1926).
134 A. 918 (Newbury v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Boutote
87 A.2d 774 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
State v. Hunter
79 A.2d 80 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)