Newburgh Steel Erecting Co. v. Ermco Erectors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Newburgh Steel Erecting Co. v. Ermco Erectors, Inc.

52 A.D.2d 934, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12803

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 24, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 934 (Newburgh Steel Erecting Co. v. Ermco Erectors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newburgh Steel Erecting Co. v. Ermco Erectors, Inc., 52 A.D.2d 934, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

The attorney for the appellant has advised this court, by letter dated April 26, 1976, that the appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered June 5, 1975 and June 13, 1975, respectively, have been withdrawn on condition that the action be remanded to the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, for the purpose of modifying the said orders in accordance with a stipulation dated November 20, 1975. In accordance with the foregoing, the appeals are deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements, and it is ordered that the action is remanded to the Supreme Court in accordance with the above-mentioned stipulation. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The attorney for the appellant has advised this court, by letter dated April 26, 1976, that the appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered June 5, 1975 and June 13, 1975, respectively, have been withdrawn on condition that the action be remanded to the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, for the purpose of modifying the said orders in accordance with a stipulation dated November 20, 1975. In accordance with the foregoing, the appeals are deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements, and it is ordered that the action is remanded to the Supreme Court in accordance with the above-mentioned stipulation. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 934, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newburgh-steel-erecting-co-v-ermco-erectors-inc-nyappdiv-1976.