Newburgh Commercial Dev. Corp. v. Cappelletti

2023 NY Slip Op 02668
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 17, 2023
DocketIndex No. 8749/19
StatusPublished

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 02668 (Newburgh Commercial Dev. Corp. v. Cappelletti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newburgh Commercial Dev. Corp. v. Cappelletti, 2023 NY Slip Op 02668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Newburgh Commercial Dev. Corp. v Cappelletti (2023 NY Slip Op 02668)
Newburgh Commercial Dev. Corp. v Cappelletti
2023 NY Slip Op 02668
Decided on May 17, 2023
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 17, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.

2020-04188
(Index No. 8749/19)

[*1]Newburgh Commercial Development Corp., et al., appellants,

v

Vincent Cappelletti, respondent.


Wichler & Gobetz, P.C., Suffern, NY (Kenneth C. Gobetz of counsel), for appellants Newburgh Commercial Development Corp., Real Holding Corp., Real Management Corp., NY, Victor Cappelletti, Christine Cappelletti, Caitlyn Ryan, and William Cappelletti.

Lazar & Schwartz, Hopewell Junction, NY (Brett E. Jones of counsel), for appellant Jeanmarie Cappelletti.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Sandra B. Sciortino, J.), dated April 15, 2020. The order denied the plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment for a declaratory judgment in their favor and granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment on his counterclaims and dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal from the order terminated with the entry of the judgment in this action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the related appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501[a][1]; Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d at 248; Newburgh Commercial Dev. Corp., v Cappelletti, _____ AD3d _____ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2020-04756; decided herewith]).

DUFFY, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, ZAYAS and WAN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 02668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newburgh-commercial-dev-corp-v-cappelletti-nyappdiv-2023.