Newborn v. Hollembeak

Fourth Circuit

Newborn v. Hollembeak

672 F. App'x 274

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2016·No. No. 16-7348·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Newborn, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Newborn v. Hollembeak, No. 5:16-hc-02040-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Newborn, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Newborn v. Hollembeak, No. 5:16-hc-02040-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Newborn v. Hollembeak, 672 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

672 F. App'x 274 (Newborn v. Hollembeak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related