Newborn v. Apker

Fourth Circuit

Newborn v. Apker

585 F. App'x 191

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 18, 2014·No. No. 14-6874·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Newborn, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. -We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Newborn v. Apker, No. 5:13-hc-02176-FL, 2014 WL 2589418 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21, 2014 & June 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Newborn, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. -We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Newborn v. Apker, No. 5:13-hc-02176-FL, 2014 WL 2589418 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21, 2014 & June 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Newborn v. Apker, 585 F. App'x 191 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

585 F. App'x 191 (Newborn v. Apker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related