Newbold v. Stansberry
This text of Newbold v. Stansberry (Newbold v. Stansberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6304
JOSEPH KENNETH NEWBOLD,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01266-LO-JFA)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Kenneth Newbold, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Joseph Kenneth Newbold, a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Newbold v. Stansberry, No. 1:08-cv-
01266-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 12, 2009; entered Jan. 13,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Newbold v. Stansberry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newbold-v-stansberry-ca4-2009.