Newbold v. Stansberry

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 2009
Docket09-6304
StatusUnpublished

This text of Newbold v. Stansberry (Newbold v. Stansberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newbold v. Stansberry, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6304

JOSEPH KENNETH NEWBOLD,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01266-LO-JFA)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Kenneth Newbold, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph Kenneth Newbold, a federal prisoner, appeals

the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Newbold v. Stansberry, No. 1:08-cv-

01266-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 12, 2009; entered Jan. 13,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Newbold v. Stansberry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newbold-v-stansberry-ca4-2009.