Newbold v. Ridgeway & Newbold

Supreme Court of Delaware

Newbold v. Ridgeway & Newbold

1 Del. 55

DecidedJune 15, 1832

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. 55 (Newbold v. Ridgeway & Newbold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newbold v. Ridgeway & Newbold, 1 Del. 55 (Del. 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

An objection has been made for want of proper parties, John New-bold the other tenant in common, not being included. This question was settled in the court below on demurrer. This proceeding is only for dower out of that particular part of the land of Barzilla Newbold, that was assigned to Anthony T. Newbold.

The general principles of the doctrine I have advanced are not denied as applicable at law, and equity follows the law.

The decree of the Court of Chancery was affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An objection has been made for want of proper parties, John New-bold the other tenant in common, not being included. This question was settled in the court below on demurrer. This proceeding is only for dower out of that particular part of the land of Barzilla Newbold, that was assigned to Anthony T. Newbold.

The general principles of the doctrine I have advanced are not denied as applicable at law, and equity follows the law.

The decree of the Court of Chancery was affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Del. 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newbold-v-ridgeway-newbold-del-1832.