Newberry v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Newberry v. State

130 S.E. 367, 34 Ga. App. 533, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 396

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 12, 1925

Docket16764

StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E. 367 (Newberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newberry v. State, 130 S.E. 367, 34 Ga. App. 533, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 396 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial contained but one ground, to wit, that the court erred in refusing the defendant’s motion to direct a verdict in his favor. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court the refusal to direct a verdict is never error.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth,: JJ., eoneur. B. B. Marlin, J. H. Fletcher, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general,' B. B. Arnold, E. C. Hill, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial contained but one ground, to wit, that the court erred in refusing the defendant’s motion to direct a verdict in his favor. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court the refusal to direct a verdict is never error.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth,: JJ., eoneur. B. B. Marlin, J. H. Fletcher, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general,' B. B. Arnold, E. C. Hill, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 S.E. 367, 34 Ga. App. 533, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newberry-v-state-gactapp-1925.