Newberry v. State
979 So. 2d 343, 2008 WL 917141
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 7, 2008
Docket1D08-0860
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 979 So. 2d 343 (Newberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Newberry v. State, 979 So. 2d 343, 2008 WL 917141 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
Opinion
Maurice NEWBERRY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Maurice Newberry, pro se, Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Proctor v. State, 845 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (dismissing an untimely appeal and explaining the required elements of a petition for belated appeal).
ALLEN, WEBSTER, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shasho v. Euro Motor Sport, Inc.
979 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
979 So. 2d 343, 2008 WL 917141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newberry-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.