Newbegin v. Newton Nat. Bank
This text of 66 F. 701 (Newbegin v. Newton Nat. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case appears to have been tried by the ■circuit court under a written stipulation of the parties waiving a jury, pursuant to sections 64-9 and 700 of the Revised Statutes. The circuit court made and filed a special finding of the facts, and ordered a judgment to be entered against the plaintiff in error, who was also the plaintiff in the trial court. An inspection of the special finding of facts, as contained in the record, discloses to this court that the facts found are insufficient to sustain the judgment. The circuit court first found the existence of certain facts which clearly entitled the plaintiff to a judgment, and thereafter found that the plaintiff’s right of action was barred on the ground of laches. But no facts were found by the circuit court which are sufficient to support the conclusion that the plaintiff’s right of action was barred by laches. For these reasons the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded, with directions to award a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 F. 701, 14 C.C.A. 71, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newbegin-v-newton-nat-bank-ca8-1895.