Newark v. Benjamin
381 A.2d 793, 75 N.J. 311
Opinion
CITY OF NEWARK, JESSE L. ALLEN, MICHAEL P. BOTTONE, ANTHONY CARRINO, ANTHONY J. GUILIANO, EARL HARRIS, SHARPE JAMES, HENRY MARTINEZ, DONALD TUCKER AND MARIE L. VILLANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, AND FRANK D'ASCENSCIO, CITY CLERK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
JAMES BENJAMIN, COYT L. JONES, GEORGE JONES, CARL L. GREGORY, AND WILBUR McNEIL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE COMMITTEE OF PETITIONERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Bernard K. Freamon argued the cause for appellants.
*312 Mr. Salvatore Perillo argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Milton A. Buck, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Yanoff, reported at 144 N.J. Super. 58 (Ch. Div. 1976).
For affirmance Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Newark v. Benjamin, 381 A.2d 793, 75 N.J. 311 (N.J. 1978).
381 A.2d 793 (Newark v. Benjamin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Shain
457 A.2d 828 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
Sloan v. Lettieri
409 A.2d 829 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)