Newark v. Benjamin
This text of 381 A.2d 793 (Newark v. Benjamin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CITY OF NEWARK, JESSE L. ALLEN, MICHAEL P. BOTTONE, ANTHONY CARRINO, ANTHONY J. GUILIANO, EARL HARRIS, SHARPE JAMES, HENRY MARTINEZ, DONALD TUCKER AND MARIE L. VILLANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, AND FRANK D'ASCENSCIO, CITY CLERK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
JAMES BENJAMIN, COYT L. JONES, GEORGE JONES, CARL L. GREGORY, AND WILBUR McNEIL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE COMMITTEE OF PETITIONERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Bernard K. Freamon argued the cause for appellants.
*312 Mr. Salvatore Perillo argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Milton A. Buck, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Yanoff, reported at 144 N.J. Super. 58 (Ch. Div. 1976).
For affirmance Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
381 A.2d 793, 75 N.J. 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newark-v-benjamin-nj-1978.