Newark Live Poultry Co. v. Fauer

199 A. 12, 120 N.J.L. 187, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 348
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 29, 1938·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

There were, however, grounds for reversal urged in the court below which are not presented and argued here.

They were, error in the charge of the trial court, and refusal to charge a request of the defendant below.

Upon affirming upon the opinion of the Supreme Court we are not passing upon the foregoing grounds of appeal.

*188 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, • Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newark Live Poultry Co. v. Fauer, 199 A. 12, 120 N.J.L. 187, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 348 (N.J. 1938).

199 A. 12 (Newark Live Poultry Co. v. Fauer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Metric Investment, Inc. v. Patterson
236 A.2d 187 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Armel v. Crewick
176 A.2d 532 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
NJ MTGE. AND INVEST. CO. v. Dorsey
165 A.2d 297 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)
Claus v. Brodhead
116 A.2d 725 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)