Newark Insurance Company v. Yvonne Lewis

Fifth Circuit

Newark Insurance Company v. Yvonne Lewis

394 F.2d 618, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6972

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 13, 1968

Docket25029_1

StatusPublished

This text of 394 F.2d 618 (Newark Insurance Company v. Yvonne Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newark Insurance Company v. Yvonne Lewis, 394 F.2d 618, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6972 (5th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The controlling issue in this fall-in-the-parking-lot case is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict tested by a motion for judgment N.O.V. Since the briefs and oral argument conclusively showed that “there is a rational basis in the record for the jury’s verdict,” Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Pruitt, 5 Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 841, 850, we directed affirmance from the bench.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The controlling issue in this fall-in-the-parking-lot case is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict tested by a motion for judgment N.O.V. Since the briefs and oral argument conclusively showed that “there is a rational basis in the record for the jury’s verdict,” Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Pruitt, 5 Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 841, 850, we directed affirmance from the bench.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

394 F.2d 618, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newark-insurance-company-v-yvonne-lewis-ca5-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack