Newark Fire Insurance v. Brill
254 A.D. 834, 6 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7846
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Newark Fire Insurance v. Brill. Read the opinion of the Court — 251 A.D. 399 →
Opinion
Orders unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondents, Roxy Plumbing & Heating, Inc., and Hyman Grill. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Newark Fire Insurance v. Brill, 254 A.D. 834, 6 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
254 A.D. 834 (Newark Fire Insurance v. Brill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.