New York Yellow Cab Co. Sales Agency, Inc. v. Courtlandt Garage & Realty Corp.

208 A.D. 765
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1924·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In view of the time which must elapse before the action in the Supreme Court can be reached for trial, we are of opinion that the discretion of [766]*766the court at Special Term was not properly exercised in ordering the removal of the Municipal Court actions and consolidating them with the action pending in the Supreme Court. The orders appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for removal and consolidation denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Merrell and MeAvoy, JJ. Orders reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York Yellow Cab Co. Sales Agency, Inc. v. Courtlandt Garage & Realty Corp., 208 A.D. 765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

208 A.D. 765 (New York Yellow Cab Co. Sales Agency, Inc. v. Courtlandt Garage & Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hotel New Yorker Pharmacy, Inc. v. New Yorker Hotel Corp.
40 A.D.2d 967 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Cappiello v. Woodbury Country Club, Inc.
37 A.D.2d 815 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
Lichtenstein v. Lapadula & Villani Trucking Corp.
283 A.D. 721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)