New York v. Zappulla
546 U.S. 957, 126 S. Ct. 472, 163 L. Ed. 2d 358, 74 U.S.L.W. 3230, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 7626
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 11, 2005·No. No. 04-1520·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma paupéris granted. Motion of respondent to strike petitioner’s reply brief treated as motion to seal the brief, and motion granted. Petitioner is directed to file a redacted reply brief for the public record within 10 days. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York v. Zappulla, 546 U.S. 957, 126 S. Ct. 472, 163 L. Ed. 2d 358, 74 U.S.L.W. 3230, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 7626 (2005).
546 U.S. 957 (New York v. Zappulla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Sayles (Dissent)
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2024
State v. Sayles
348 Conn. 669 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2024)
State v. Griffin
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2021
State v. ANGEL T.
973 A.2d 1207 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2009)
United States v. Ingram
501 F.3d 963 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
Lopez v. Commonwealth of MA
480 F.3d 591 (First Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Austin
479 F.3d 363 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Ruth Kane
470 F.3d 1277 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Mueffelman
470 F.3d 33 (First Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Bradford
461 F. Supp. 2d 904 (N.D. Iowa, 2006)
David Policano v. Victor T. Herbert
430 F.3d 82 (Second Circuit, 2005)