New York v. Microsoft Corp.

D.C. Circuit

New York v. Microsoft Corp.

213 F.3d 764, 341 U.S. App. D.C. 407, 2000 WL 763610

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 2000

DocketNo. 00-5213

StatusPublished

This text of 213 F.3d 764 (New York v. Microsoft Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York v. Microsoft Corp., 213 F.3d 764, 341 U.S. App. D.C. 407, 2000 WL 763610 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In view of the exceptional importance of these cases and the fact that the number of judges of this court disqualified from participation as a practical possibility precludes any en banc rehearing of a panel decision, it is

ORDERED, sua sponte, by the en banc court that these cases and all motions and petitions filed in these cases be heard by the court sitting en banc. Parties shall hereafter file an original and nineteen copies of all pleadings and briefs submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In view of the exceptional importance of these cases and the fact that the number of judges of this court disqualified from participation as a practical possibility precludes any en banc rehearing of a panel decision, it is

ORDERED, sua sponte, by the en banc court that these cases and all motions and petitions filed in these cases be heard by the court sitting en banc. Parties shall hereafter file an original and nineteen copies of all pleadings and briefs submitted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 F.3d 764, 341 U.S. App. D.C. 407, 2000 WL 763610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-v-microsoft-corp-cadc-2000.