New York v. Hichland
18 F. Cas. 137, 6 Ben. 289
Opinion
I must overrule the exceptions to the libel in this case, on the ground that it does not appear, by the libel, that the pier named was part of the land, and was not a floating pier, while it is alleged, by the libel, that the pier was “within navigable waters from the ocean, and within the flow of tide water.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York v. Hichland, 18 F. Cas. 137, 6 Ben. 289 (S.D.N.Y. 1873).
18 F. Cas. 137 (New York v. Hichland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.