New York Urban Development Corp. v. P.G. Singh Enterprises

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

New York Urban Development Corp. v. P.G. Singh Enterprises

111 A.D.3d 537, 975 N.Y.S.2d 339

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.D.3d 537 (New York Urban Development Corp. v. P.G. Singh Enterprises) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Urban Development Corp. v. P.G. Singh Enterprises, 111 A.D.3d 537, 975 N.Y.S.2d 339 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

— Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia Kern, J.), entered February 28, 2013, which granted condemnees EG. Singh Enterprises, LLC’s and Ear-minder Kaur and Amanji Kaur’s motions for an extension of time to file appraisal reports, on condition that the interest on their claims cease to accrue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court did not abuse its discretion when it suspended the accrual of interest on the condemnees’ claims during the extension of time they sought for the completion of their appraisal reports (see e.g. Abele v State of New York, 39 Misc 3d 1240[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 52550[U] [Ct Cl 2011]; see also EDPL 514 [b]). Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia Kern, J.), entered February 28, 2013, which granted condemnees EG. Singh Enterprises, LLC’s and Ear-minder Kaur and Amanji Kaur’s motions for an extension of time to file appraisal reports, on condition that the interest on their claims cease to accrue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court did not abuse its discretion when it suspended the accrual of interest on the condemnees’ claims during the extension of time they sought for the completion of their appraisal reports (see e.g. Abele v State of New York, 39 Misc 3d 1240[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 52550[U] [Ct Cl 2011]; see also EDPL 514 [b]). Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.3d 537, 975 N.Y.S.2d 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-urban-development-corp-v-pg-singh-enterprises-nyappdiv-2013.