New York University v. Taylor

251 A.D. 444, 296 N.Y.S. 848, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6967
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 22, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 251 A.D. 444 (New York University v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York University v. Taylor, 251 A.D. 444, 296 N.Y.S. 848, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that petitioner, New York University, comes within the exemption contained in New York City Local Law No. 20 of 1934 (published as No. 21), known as the Retail Sales Tax Act, as amended by Local Law No. 24 of 1934 (published as No. 25). (Local Law No. 29 of 1935; Local Law No. 31 of 1936.)

The local law provides as follows: Receipts from sales or services * * * by or to semi-public institutions * * * shall not be subject to tax hereunder.” (§ 2.)

The local law defines a semi-public ” institution as “ Those charitable and religious institutions which are supported wholly or in part by public subscriptions or endowment and are not organized or operated for profit.” (§ 1, subd. [h].)

It is undisputed that petitioner is an institution supported in part by public subscription and endowment and is not organized or operated for profit. Moreover, we think that it is a charitable institution within the meaning of the statute (Hamburger v. Cornell University, 240 N. Y. 328; Butterworth v. Keeler, 219 id. 446) and accordingly is not subject to the provisions of the Sales Tax Act.

The order of certiorari should be sustained and the comptroller’s determination annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements to the petitioner.

Present ■— Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents and votes to dismiss order of certiorari and confirm determination.

Order of certiorari sustained and determination of the comptroller of the city of New York annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements to the petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Provident Loan Society v. Chambers
196 Misc. 367 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. McGoldrick
268 A.D. 277 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)
People ex rel. Doctor's Hospital, Inc. v. Sexton
267 A.D. 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)
In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of Labor Law
262 A.D. 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Philadelphia
11 A.2d 529 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D. 444, 296 N.Y.S. 848, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-university-v-taylor-nyappdiv-1937.