New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National Bank of Far Rockaway
35 N.E.2d 498, 285 N.Y. 825, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1794
Opinion
We agree that regardless of the construction of the scope and the effect of section 25-a of the Lien Law. no action at law can be brought by a single creditor. The determination of the construction and effect of section 25-a must await a case in which such question is necessarily presented.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Concur: Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Taking no part: Lehman, Ch. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National Bank of Far Rockaway, 35 N.E.2d 498, 285 N.Y. 825, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1794 (N.Y. 1941).
35 N.E.2d 498 (New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National Bank of Far Rockaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ryan Stone Co. v. Central School District No. 3
23 A.D.2d 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
American Blower Corp. v. Talcott
176 N.E.2d 833 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
Imperial Plumbing & Heating Corp. v. Stratford Development Corp.
26 Misc. 2d 815 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Gramatan-Sullivan, Inc. v. Nathan Koslow
240 F.2d 523 (Second Circuit, 1957)
Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Barr Wrecking Corp.
180 Misc. 200 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
Saltser & Weinsier, Inc. v. Monroe Plumbing & Heating Supply Corp.
265 A.D. 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Raymond Concrete Pile Co. v. Federation Bank & Trust Co.
43 N.E.2d 486 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)
New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National Bank
177 Misc. 954 (New York Supreme Court, 1941)
People v. Gillette
177 Misc. 702 (New York County Courts, 1941)