New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National Bank

260 A.D. 1035, 24 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5959
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 16, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 260 A.D. 1035 (New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National Bank, 260 A.D. 1035, 24 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5959 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

In an action for money had and received the plaintiffs sue to recover unpaid balances due them for materials furnished under a contract for a public improvement. The complaint alleges that the defendant bank, in which the contractors deposited the final payment received by them from the New York City Parkway Authority, paid the entire fund to itself on account of an indebtedness owing to it by the contractors. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and the motion was denied. Order, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. It does not appear that any of the plaintiffs had filed hens. Hence they acquired no rights under sections 25 and 25-a of the Lien Law. (Amiesite Constr. Corp. v. Luciano Contr. Co., 284 N. Y. 223.) Under the construction placed upon the statute in that decision, the funds received by a contractor do not acquire the character of trust funds unless and until a hen is filed while the funds are in the contractor’s hands. The plaintiffs are, therefore, in the position of ordinary creditors of the contractors, and the complaint alleges no facts from which the conclusion could be drawn that their claim is superior to that of the defendant. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Imperial Plumbing & Heating Corp. v. Stratford Development Corp.
26 Misc. 2d 815 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Gramatan-Sullivan, Inc. v. Nathan Koslow
240 F.2d 523 (Second Circuit, 1957)
Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Barr Wrecking Corp.
180 Misc. 200 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
Saltser & Weinsier, Inc. v. Monroe Plumbing & Heating Supply Corp.
265 A.D. 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National Bank
177 Misc. 954 (New York Supreme Court, 1941)
People v. Gillette
177 Misc. 702 (New York County Courts, 1941)
Stancs v. County Trust Co.
262 A.D. 1039 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
Wickes Boiler Co. v. Godfrey-Keeler Co.
121 F.2d 415 (Second Circuit, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 1035, 24 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-trap-rock-corp-v-national-bank-nyappdiv-1940.