New York Trap Rock Co. v. Brown

Supreme Court of New Jersey

New York Trap Rock Co. v. Brown

43 A. 100, 61 N.J.L. 536, 32 Vroom 536, 1898 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 152

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedFebruary 15, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 43 A. 100 (New York Trap Rock Co. v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Trap Rock Co. v. Brown, 43 A. 100, 61 N.J.L. 536, 32 Vroom 536, 1898 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 152 (N.J. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

1. Failure to make profert can only be objected, to by a special demurrer. The twelfth section of the statute on amendments and jeofails is a substantial copy of the first section of the act of 4 Anne, c. 16, and was introduced in our legislation in 1794. Pat. L.,p. 126.

2. The clause providing for payment of penalties sued for is sufficiently set out.

3 and 4. A contract that a single person shall be employed as the sole agent of manufacturers to sell all their output, does not violate any principle of law and may be enforced.

5 and 6. The contract is not objectionable on the grounds named in this specification of causes, and the declaration shows a legal cause of action.

If defendant has a meritorious defence, he may apply for leave to withdraw demurrer and plead.

The demurrer must be overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI