New York Title & Mortgage Co. v. Polk Arms, Inc.

237 A.D. 852
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate the order dated August 1,1932, appointing a receiver of the rents and profits of the mortgaged premises, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that plaintiff failed to comply with the provisions of Section 150 of the General Corporation Law. In our opinion, according to the provisions of this section, a receiver can be appointed in an action of this kind where the property belongs to a corporation only upon a showing that the mortgage debt or the interest thereon has remained unpaid for at least thirty days after payment demanded, and, in addition to this, it must be shown that either the income of the property is specifically mortgaged or that the property itself appears to be insufficient to pay the mortgage debt. In the present case, the plaintiff failed to show that the mortgage debt or interest thereon remained unpaid for at least thirty days after payment demanded, and, for this reason, the order appointing the receiver was improperly made. (Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Roerich Museum, 236 App. Div. 76.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York Title & Mortgage Co. v. Polk Arms, Inc., 237 A.D. 852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

237 A.D. 852 (New York Title & Mortgage Co. v. Polk Arms, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. Fairdeal Holding Corp.
238 A.D. 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)