New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and Aberbathy v. Sullivan
This text of 376 U.S. 967 (New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and Aberbathy v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
376 U.S. 967
NEW YORK TIMES CO.
v.
SULLIVAN and
ABERBATHY ET AL.
v.
SULLIVAN.
No. 39.
No. 40.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 6, 1964.
Ante, p. 254. The motion of respondent for the apportionment of printing costs and fees is denied. Sam Rice Baker, M. Roland Nachman, Jr. and Calvin Whitesell on the motion. Herbert Wechsler for New York Times Co., in opposition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
376 U.S. 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-times-co-v-sullivan-and-aberbathy-v-sullivan-scotus-1964.