New York Telephone Co. v. Speciner

434 N.E.2d 708, 55 N.Y.2d 1002, 449 N.Y.S.2d 472, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3174
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 1982·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order insofar as appealed from reversed, with costs, cross motion for a permanent stay denied, and motion to compel arbitration granted. A timely demand for arbitration was made by Marshall in February, 1972 well within the six-year Statute of Limitations and was judicially stayed until the condition precedent to arbitration was satisfied. The condition was met in November, 1973 after Marshall submitted its claim to the architect who failed to render a decision within 10 days. Any further questions as to undue delay or abandonment of the proceeding are for the arbitrator (see Matter of County of Rockland [Primiano Constr. Co.], 51 NY2d 1).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, and Meyer. Taking no part: Judges Gabrielli and Fuchsberg.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York Telephone Co. v. Speciner, 434 N.E.2d 708, 55 N.Y.2d 1002, 449 N.Y.S.2d 472, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3174 (N.Y. 1982).

434 N.E.2d 708 (New York Telephone Co. v. Speciner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v. Powell
126 A.D.3d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Gibeault v. Home Insurance
277 A.D.2d 680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Continental Insurance v. Right
253 A.D.2d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)