New York Telephone Co. v. Ruiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

New York Telephone Co. v. Ruiz

97 A.D.2d 398, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19981

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 3, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.D.2d 398 (New York Telephone Co. v. Ruiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Telephone Co. v. Ruiz, 97 A.D.2d 398, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19981 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, defendant Anthony Urciuoli appeals from (1) an ex parte order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Coppola, J.), dated November 18, 1982, which authorized expedient service to be made on defendant Kenneth Ruiz, and (2) so much of an order of the same court (Rosenblatt, J.), dated March 30, 1983, as upon reargument, denied defendant Urciuoli’s motion to vacate the order dated November 18, 1982. Appeal from order dated November 18, 1982, dismissed. No appeal lies from an ex parte order (CPLR 5701, subd [a], par 2). Order dated March 30, 1983, affirmed, insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, defendant Anthony Urciuoli appeals from (1) an ex parte order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Coppola, J.), dated November 18, 1982, which authorized expedient service to be made on defendant Kenneth Ruiz, and (2) so much of an order of the same court (Rosenblatt, J.), dated March 30, 1983, as upon reargument, denied defendant Urciuoli’s motion to vacate the order dated November 18, 1982. Appeal from order dated November 18, 1982, dismissed. No appeal lies from an ex parte order (CPLR 5701, subd [a], par 2). Order dated March 30, 1983, affirmed, insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.D.2d 398, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-telephone-co-v-ruiz-nyappdiv-1983.