New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad v. Newbaker

101 A. 1054, 90 N.J.L. 713, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 416
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJuly 18, 1917
StatusPublished

This text of 101 A. 1054 (New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad v. Newbaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad v. Newbaker, 101 A. 1054, 90 N.J.L. 713, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 416 (N.J. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be reversed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Ganison in the case of George A. Rounsaville v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, No. 81 of the November term, 1915, recently decided in this court upon the authority of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Erie Railroad Co. v. Amy L. Winfield (opinion by Mr. Justice Van Devanter), 244 U. S. 170.

[714]*714For affirmance—None.

For reversal—The Chancellor., Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Erie Railroad Company v. Winfield
244 U.S. 170 (Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A. 1054, 90 N.J.L. 713, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-susquehanna-western-railroad-v-newbaker-nj-1917.