New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad v. Newbaker

101 A. 1054, 90 N.J.L. 713, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 416
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 18, 1917·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be reversed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Ganison in the case of George A. Rounsaville v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, No. 81 of the November term, 1915, recently decided in this court upon the authority of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Erie Railroad Co. v. Amy L. Winfield (opinion by Mr. Justice Van Devanter), 244 U. S. 170.

[714]*714For affirmance—None.

For reversal—The Chancellor., Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad v. Newbaker, 101 A. 1054, 90 N.J.L. 713, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 416 (N.J. 1917).

101 A. 1054 (New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad v. Newbaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erie Railroad Company v. Winfield
244 U.S. 170 (Supreme Court, 1916)