New York Surplus & Jobbing Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

New York Surplus & Jobbing Corp. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 349

United States Customs Court·Decided August 30, 1956·No. No. 60204; protest 260689-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that bale No. 13 in entry 47370 and 2 bales within the bales marked 1001/1119 in entry 25407, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon the bales of merchandise reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that bale No. 13 in entry 47370 and 2 bales within the bales marked 1001/1119 in entry 25407, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon the bales of merchandise reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.

New York Surplus & Jobbing Corp. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 349 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

37 Cust. Ct. 349 (New York Surplus & Jobbing Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.