New York State Labor Relations Board v. Kleen-Rite Process Corp.

258 A.D. 59, 15 N.Y.S.2d 589, 5 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 978, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6359
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 17, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 258 A.D. 59 (New York State Labor Relations Board v. Kleen-Rite Process Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York State Labor Relations Board v. Kleen-Rite Process Corp., 258 A.D. 59, 15 N.Y.S.2d 589, 5 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 978, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6359 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court did not acquire jurisdiction to punish the appellant Harry Urovsky for contempt for the reason that he was not made a party to this proceeding by any process directed against him. (Judiciary Law, § 751.)

The order should also be modified as to the appellant KleenRite Process Corporation by efiminating the fine of $250 imposed [60]*60under section 773 of the Judiciary Law, stated in the order to represent the “ costs and expenses ” of the proceeding and directed to be paid to the New York State Labor Relations Board. The record contains no evidence of the amount of these costs and expenses, which, accordingly, cannot be allowed. (People ex rel. Lawyers’ Surety Co. v. Anthony, 7 App. Div. 132; affd., 151 N. Y. 620; Fenlon v. Dempsey, 50 Hun, 131.)

The order appealed from should be modified by striking therefrom all provisions for relief as against Harry Urovsky and further by eliminating the provision imposing a fine of $250 for costs and expenses on Kleen-Rifce Process Corporation; and, as so modified, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant Harry Urovsky, and without costs to the appellant Kleen-Rite Process Corporation.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyeb, Cohn and Callahan,. JJ.

Order unanimously modified as indicated in opinion, and, as so modified, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant Harry Urovsky, and without costs to the appellant Kleen-Rite Process Corporation. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kuriansky v. Ali
176 A.D.2d 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Spuncraft, Inc. v. Lori Jay Manufacturing Co.
47 Misc. 2d 780 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Samuels v. Ganz
174 Misc. 399 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 A.D. 59, 15 N.Y.S.2d 589, 5 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 978, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-state-labor-relations-board-v-kleen-rite-process-corp-nyappdiv-1939.