New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. Fischer

24 A.D.2d 683, 261 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3547
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 13, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 683 (New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. Fischer, 24 A.D.2d 683, 261 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

Herlihy, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment and order awarding damages against the defendant, contending that the applicable measure of damages was the cost of replacing the pole and the wires (see 43 Misc 2d 178). The plaintiff was awarded partial summary judgment as to the negligence resulting in the destruction of a telephone pole and wires by a truck driver employed by the defendant. Thereafter, testimony was taken before Special Term as the result of which an award was made in the amount of $443.96, computed as follows: $334.16 was allowed for emergency expenses (crews to remove wires and pole from the road on the day of the accident, rerouting the wires to restore service, etc.) in accordance with testimony by an accountant of the plaintiff; $90.63 for the cost of the wires, based upon a present-day reproduction cost of wires at $177.01 less 48.8% depreciation; $47.52 for the cost of the pole, based upon a present-day reproduction cost of the pole at $237.60 less 80% depreciation and a refund allowance of salvage value of the property of $28.35. We are of the opinion that the rule of damages as established by the Special Term was correct. The rule seems to be settled in the State that as to damages to utility property, the basis for a recovery consists of the actual cost of emergency expenses together with the present-day cost of replacing the damaged or destroyed equipment, less accrued depreciation, and any allowance for salvage. (See Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Smith, 11 A D 2d 905.) Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kansas Power & Light Co. v. Thatcher
797 P.2d 162 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1990)
State v. Sossei
144 A.D.2d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Modern Graphics, Inc. v. Belger Cartage Services, Inc.
668 S.W.2d 111 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1984)
Public Service Elec. & Gas Co. v. Stone
446 A.2d 578 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
Public Service Co. of New Mexico v. Jasso
635 P.2d 1003 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1981)
Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. Hinterlong
437 N.E.2d 11 (Hamilton County Municipal Court, 1981)
Curt's Trucking Co. v. City of Anchorage
578 P.2d 975 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1978)
Scott & Williams, Inc. v. Pittston Stevedoring Corp.
422 F. Supp. 40 (S.D. New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 683, 261 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-state-electric-gas-corp-v-fischer-nyappdiv-1965.