New York State Division of Human Rights v. Fulton Footcare Associates, P.C.

15 A.D.3d 583, 789 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1876

This text of 15 A.D.3d 583 (New York State Division of Human Rights v. Fulton Footcare Associates, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York State Division of Human Rights v. Fulton Footcare Associates, P.C., 15 A.D.3d 583, 789 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to enforce a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights dated August 13, 2002, which, after a hearing, found that the respondents had unlawfully discriminated against the complainant in the terms and conditions of her employment and awarded the complainant $7,000 in compensatory damages for mental anguish.

Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, with costs, the determination is confirmed, and the respondents are directed to pay to the complainant the sum of $7,000, plus interest from August 13, 2002.

The determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights finding unlawful discrimination was supported by substantial evidence (see Mittl v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 100 NY2d 326 [2003]; Rio Mar Rest. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 270 AD2d 47 [2000]). In addition, the award of damages for mental anguish was reasonably related to the discriminatory conduct (see Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v State Div. of Human Rights, 78 NY2d 207 [1991]; Matter of Town of Hempstead v State Div. of Human Rights, 233 AD2d 451 [1996]). Florio, J.E, Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mittl v. New York State Division of Human Rights
794 N.E.2d 660 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)
New York City Transit Authority v. State Division of Human Rights
577 N.E.2d 40 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Town of Hempstead v. State Division of Human Rights
233 A.D.2d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Rio Mar Restaurant v. New York State Division of Human Rights
270 A.D.2d 47 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.3d 583, 789 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-state-division-of-human-rights-v-fulton-footcare-associates-pc-nyappdiv-2005.