New York State Bankers Ass'n v. Wetzler

184 A.D.2d 1077, 586 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8342

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court (Corning, J.). We add only that there is no merit to defendant’s contention that plaintiffs’ challenge to the subject legislation does not present a justiciable controversy (see, Matter of Korn v Gulotta, 72 NY2d 363, 369; People v Tremaine, 281 NY 1; Winner v Cuomo, 176 AD2d 60; Matter of Schulz v State of New York, 152 Misc 2d 589; see also, Saxton v Carey, 44 NY2d 545, 551). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J. — Declaratory Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Boehm and Davis, JJ. [See, 151 Misc 2d 684.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York State Bankers Ass'n v. Wetzler, 184 A.D.2d 1077, 586 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

184 A.D.2d 1077 (New York State Bankers Ass'n v. Wetzler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Tremaine
21 N.E.2d 891 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)
Korn v. Gulotta
72 N.Y.2d 363 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Winner v. Cuomo
176 A.D.2d 60 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
New York State Bankers Ass'n v. Wetzler
151 Misc. 2d 684 (New York Supreme Court, 1991)
Schulz v. State
152 Misc. 2d 589 (New York Supreme Court, 1991)