New York Seven-Up Bottling Co. v. Dow Chemical Co.
This text of 462 N.E.2d 150 (New York Seven-Up Bottling Co. v. Dow Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[830]*830OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (96 AD2d 1051). We note, however, that this case, unlike Lindsey v Robins Co. (60 NY2d 417, 429), does not involve a fact question concerning when the defect first caused injury. Here the roof was leaking “like a sieve” in 1972, so injury to plaintiff from the defect clearly occurred more than three years before suit was brought.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
462 N.E.2d 150, 61 N.Y.2d 828, 473 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-seven-up-bottling-co-v-dow-chemical-co-ny-1984.