New York Rectifying Co. v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

New York Rectifying Co. v. United States

18 F. Cas. 158, 14 Blatchf. 549, 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 1948

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJune 27, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 18 F. Cas. 158 (New York Rectifying Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Rectifying Co. v. United States, 18 F. Cas. 158, 14 Blatchf. 549, 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 1948 (circtsdny 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

WAITE, Circuit Justice.

Section 3319 of the Revised Statutes is as follows: “It shall not he lawful for any rectifier of distilled spirits, or wholesale or retail liquor dealer, to purchase or receive any distilled spirits, in quantities greater than twenty gallons, from any person other than an authorized rectifier of distilled spirits, distiller, or wholesale liquor dealer. Every person who violates this section shall forfeit and pay one thousand dollars: provided,” &c. The plaintiff in error, a rectifier of distilled spirits, contracted with Fleischman & Co., authorized distillers, for twenty-five barrels of highwines, to be delivered August 14th, 1873. On the day named Fleischman & Co. delivered fifteen barrels of their own manufacture, and announced their inability to deliver more. The full number being insisted upon, Fleischman & Co. delivered, and the plaintiff in error received, under the contract, the remaining ten barrels, stamped and marked in a manner to indicate that they had been made by some distiller other than Fleischman & Co. Fleischman & Co. were not authorized rectifiers, or authorized wholesale or retail liquor dealers. .Upon this state of facts the district court properly gave judgment against the plaintiff in error, for the penalty imposed by the section just quoted. A distiller is only authorized, by virtue of his occupation as a distiller, to sell spirits of his own production. Every person who sells spirits, except as a distiller properly may, is a wholesale or retail liquor dealer, according to the quantity he. sells. Rev. St. § 3244, par. 4. Fleischman & Co., in their sale and delivery of the ten barrels, acted as wholesale dealers and not as distillers. Not being authorized wholesale dealers, the plaintiff in error, a rectifier, was prohibited by the statute from receiving this delivery from them. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WAITE, Circuit Justice.

Section 3319 of the Revised Statutes is as follows: “It shall not he lawful for any rectifier of distilled spirits, or wholesale or retail liquor dealer, to purchase or receive any distilled spirits, in quantities greater than twenty gallons, from any person other than an authorized rectifier of distilled spirits, distiller, or wholesale liquor dealer. Every person who violates this section shall forfeit and pay one thousand dollars: provided,” &c. The plaintiff in error, a rectifier of distilled spirits, contracted with Fleischman & Co., authorized distillers, for twenty-five barrels of highwines, to be delivered August 14th, 1873. On the day named Fleischman & Co. delivered fifteen barrels of their own manufacture, and announced their inability to deliver more. The full number being insisted upon, Fleischman & Co. delivered, and the plaintiff in error received, under the contract, the remaining ten barrels, stamped and marked in a manner to indicate that they had been made by some distiller other than Fleischman & Co. Fleischman & Co. were not authorized rectifiers, or authorized wholesale or retail liquor dealers. .Upon this state of facts the district court properly gave judgment against the plaintiff in error, for the penalty imposed by the section just quoted. A distiller is only authorized, by virtue of his occupation as a distiller, to sell spirits of his own production. Every person who sells spirits, except as a distiller properly may, is a wholesale or retail liquor dealer, according to the quantity he. sells. Rev. St. § 3244, par. 4. Fleischman & Co., in their sale and delivery of the ten barrels, acted as wholesale dealers and not as distillers. Not being authorized wholesale dealers, the plaintiff in error, a rectifier, was prohibited by the statute from receiving this delivery from them. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 F. Cas. 158, 14 Blatchf. 549, 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 1948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-rectifying-co-v-united-states-circtsdny-1878.