New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. Auto One Insurance

28 A.D.3d 441, 811 N.Y.S.2d 584
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 4, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 28 A.D.3d 441 (New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. Auto One Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. Auto One Insurance, 28 A.D.3d 441, 811 N.Y.S.2d 584 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In an action to recover no-fault insurance benefits under certain insurance contracts, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), dated August 18, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment entered April 1, 2005, upon its failure to appear or answer, awarding the plaintiffs the principal sum of $28,060.13, and for an extension of time to answer pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) , and granted the defendant’s separate motion to quash an information subpoena.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion to vacate its default in answering and for an extension of time to answer pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d). The defendant demonstrated both a reasonable excuse for its brief delay in serving an answer, and potentially meritorious defenses. Furthermore, there is a strong public policy in favor of resolving cases on the merits, and the default was not willful, nor was there a showing of prejudice to the plaintiffs [442]*442(see Harcztark v Drive Variety, Inc., 21 AD3d 876 [2005]; Bunch v Dollar Budget, Inc., 12 AD3d 391 [2004]; Orwell Bldg. Corp. v Bessaha, 5 AD3d 573 [2004]; Sippin v Gallardo, 287 AD2d 703 [2001]).

The defendant’s motion to quash the information subpoena was properly granted (see CPLR 2304). Florio, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miyahara v. Majsak
117 A.D.3d 812 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Stephan B. Gleich & Associates v. Gritsipis
87 A.D.3d 216 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Moore v. Day
55 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
CPS Group, Inc. v. Gastro Enterprises, Corp.
54 A.D.3d 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Falla v. Keel Holdings, LLC
50 A.D.3d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
City Line Auto Mall, Inc. v. Citicorp Leasing, Inc.
45 A.D.3d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Giacopelli v. Guiducci
36 A.D.3d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Cooney v. Cambridge Management & Realty Corp.
35 A.D.3d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
A & C Construction Inc. v. Flanagan
34 A.D.3d 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
New York University Hospital Rusk Institute v. Illinois National Insurance
31 A.D.3d 511 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 A.D.3d 441, 811 N.Y.S.2d 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-presbyterian-hospital-v-auto-one-insurance-nyappdiv-2006.