New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. United States
116 F.2d 799, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4755
Opinion
Although it appears clear that the District Court lacks jurisdiction, we deny the motion because (1) the District Judge has not been made a party and (2) this Court lacks jurisdiction under the doctrine of In re Heilbroner, 2 Cir., 69 F.2d 643.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. United States, 116 F.2d 799, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4755 (2d Cir. 1940).
116 F.2d 799 (New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Waterman S. S. Corp. v. Land
151 F.2d 292 (D.C. Circuit, 1945)
New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. United States
36 F. Supp. 190 (E.D. New York, 1940)