New York Plumbers' Specialties Co. v. Fitzgerald

265 A.D. 949, 38 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6688
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 14, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 265 A.D. 949 (New York Plumbers' Specialties Co. v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York Plumbers' Specialties Co. v. Fitzgerald, 265 A.D. 949, 38 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

The moneys that came into the hands of the assignee for the benefit of creditors were at no time the moneys of the owners of the realty on which improvements were made by Interborough Utilities Co. The moneys were indirectly obtained from the United States of America by means of forged notes. Under the circumstances, no trust fund could be created for plaintiff’s benefit under section 36-a of the Lien Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 33). The right of the United States of America to these funds is traceable to the assignee for the benefit of creditors. (National City Bank of New York v. Waggoner, 230 App. Div. 88.) Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. Lazansky, P„ J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on two days’ notice on or before December 21, 1942.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canron Corp. v. City of New York
214 A.D.2d 115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 949, 38 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-plumbers-specialties-co-v-fitzgerald-nyappdiv-1942.