New York, O. & W. RY. CO. v. Cornell Steamboat Co.

Second Circuit

New York, O. & W. RY. CO. v. Cornell Steamboat Co.

193 F. 380, 113 C.C.A. 306, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4786

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 11, 1911

DocketNo. 30

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 193 F. 380 (New York, O. & W. RY. CO. v. Cornell Steamboat Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York, O. & W. RY. CO. v. Cornell Steamboat Co., 193 F. 380, 113 C.C.A. 306, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4786 (2d Cir. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with Judlge Hough for the reasons given by him that the respondent was solely at fault, and this whether the tow was hanging from Pier 1 straight down the river, as he found, or was swung in by the freshet current toward Pier A, as the respondent contended. It was not in a slip in either case but in waters which the fire boat had a right to use.

Decree affirmed, with interest and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with Judlge Hough for the reasons given by him that the respondent was solely at fault, and this whether the tow was hanging from Pier 1 straight down the river, as he found, or was swung in by the freshet current toward Pier A, as the respondent contended. It was not in a slip in either case but in waters which the fire boat had a right to use.

Decree affirmed, with interest and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 F. 380, 113 C.C.A. 306, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-o-w-ry-co-v-cornell-steamboat-co-ca2-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack