New York & New Haven Railroad v. Schuyler

28 How. Pr. 187
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 28 How. Pr. 187 (New York & New Haven Railroad v. Schuyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York & New Haven Railroad v. Schuyler, 28 How. Pr. 187 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1855).

Opinion

Cowles, J.,

said, that without considering the other grounds of the motion, the injunction must be dissolved on account of the affinity of the judge ivho granted the injunction to one of the defendants in the cause.

Injunction dissolved.

Upon the appeal of the plaintiff to the general term of the court, the order dissolving the injunction was affirmed, [192]*192but as the court had decided at the same general term on appeal, that the complaint could not be sustained, it became unnecessary to consider the special ground on which the injunction was dissolved on this motion in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Perez v. Wall
41 Fla. 463 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1899)
Tegarden v. Phillips
42 N.E. 549 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 How. Pr. 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-new-haven-railroad-v-schuyler-nysupct-1855.