New York & New Haven Railroad v. Schuyler

28 How. Pr. 187
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1855·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Cowles, J.,

said, that without considering the other grounds of the motion, the injunction must be dissolved on account of the affinity of the judge ivho granted the injunction to one of the defendants in the cause.

Injunction dissolved.

Upon the appeal of the plaintiff to the general term of the court, the order dissolving the injunction was affirmed, [192] but as the court had decided at the same general term on appeal, that the complaint could not be sustained, it became unnecessary to consider the special ground on which the injunction was dissolved on this motion in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York & New Haven Railroad v. Schuyler, 28 How. Pr. 187 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1855).

28 How. Pr. 187 (New York & New Haven Railroad v. Schuyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Perez v. Wall
41 Fla. 463 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1899)
Tegarden v. Phillips
42 N.E. 549 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1895)