New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Town of Plymouth

193 U.S. 668, 24 S. Ct. 854, 48 L. Ed. 839, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 647
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 21, 1904·No. No. 192·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on authority of Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180; Layton v. Missouri, 187 U. S. 356; Hooker v. Los Angeles, 188 U. S. 314; Ansbro v. United States, 159 U. S. 695; New York and New England Railroad Company v. Bristol, 151 U. S. 556.

Mr. William F. Henney for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles E. Perkins and Mr. Samuel A. Herman for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Town of Plymouth, 193 U.S. 668, 24 S. Ct. 854, 48 L. Ed. 839, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 647 (1904).

193 U.S. 668 (New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Town of Plymouth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New York & New England Railroad v. Bristol
151 U.S. 556 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Sayward v. Denny
158 U.S. 180 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Ansbro v. United States
159 U.S. 695 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Layton v. Missouri
187 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Hooker v. Los Angeles
188 U.S. 314 (Supreme Court, 1903)