New York Lumber Trade Association v. Lacey

200 N.E. 54, 269 N.Y. 677, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1461
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in New York Lumber Trade Association v. Lacey. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 N.Y. 595
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 14, 1936·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto, after the words and the same hereby is affirmed with costs,” the following: this court having held that if there is any illegality in defendants’ action it arises from encroachment upon rights regulated by the Shipping Act; and that while this court has jurisdiction of the Labor Unions, yet the courts of this State should not grant an injunction until the Shipping Board has by its order defined the plaintiffs’ rights.” (See 269 N. Y. 595.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York Lumber Trade Association v. Lacey, 200 N.E. 54, 269 N.Y. 677, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1461 (N.Y. 1936).

200 N.E. 54 (New York Lumber Trade Association v. Lacey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New York Lumber Trade Association v. Lacey
199 N.E. 688 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)