New York Lumber Trade Association v. Lacey

200 N.E. 54, 269 N.Y. 677, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1461
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 14, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 200 N.E. 54 (New York Lumber Trade Association v. Lacey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York Lumber Trade Association v. Lacey, 200 N.E. 54, 269 N.Y. 677, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1461 (N.Y. 1936).

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto, after the words and the same hereby is affirmed with costs,” the following: this court having held that if there is any illegality in defendants’ action it arises from encroachment upon rights regulated by the Shipping Act; and that while this court has jurisdiction of the Labor Unions, yet the courts of this State should not grant an injunction until the Shipping Board has by its order defined the plaintiffs’ rights.” (See 269 N. Y. 595.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York Lumber Trade Association v. Lacey
199 N.E. 688 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 N.E. 54, 269 N.Y. 677, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-lumber-trade-association-v-lacey-ny-1936.