New York Live Poultry Trucking Co. v. Schwartz

135 A. 775, 5 N.J. Misc. 178, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 342
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 25, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 135 A. 775 (New York Live Poultry Trucking Co. v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York Live Poultry Trucking Co. v. Schwartz, 135 A. 775, 5 N.J. Misc. 178, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 342 (N.J. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The commissioner awarded for temporary disability, but refused to award for permanent disability. On appeal to the [179]*179Common Pleas, that court, acting under the amendment of 1921 to paragraph 19 of the act (see Pamph. L. 1921, at pp. 734, 735), considered the evidence taken before the commissioner, reweighed it, concluded that permanent disability had been shown, and made award accordingly. The matter is now before us on certiorari.

Two points are made — the first is that the Pleas had no jurisdiction to reverse the findings of fact of the commissioner, based on the same evidence. But we think it was the very object of the amendment of 1921 to give the Pleas jurisdiction to review the findings of fact on a written transcript of the testimony, and determine the merits of the controversy. Jayson v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 3 N. J. Adv. R. 199; Charlock v. Kellogg Co., 4 N. J. Mis. R. 260.

The other point is that, assuming the jurisdiction of the pleas to reverse the finding of fact, there was no evidence to support such reversal. It is doubtless true that the petitioner was suffering from venereal disease and its resultants, but on the evidence the court below was entitled to find that the disease was more or less dormant until wakened by the accident; which in such case may be said to have caused the injury in a legal sense. Atchison v. Colgate & Co., 3 N. J. Mis. R. 451; Lundy v. George Brown & Co., 93 N. J. L. 107, 110; Winter v. Atkinson Frizzells Co., 88 Id. 401; Voorhees v. Smith Schoonmaker Co., 86 Id. 501.

The judgment of the Common Pleas will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Monaco v. Renton
108 A.2d 506 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Justice v. Panther Coal Co.
2 S.E.2d 333 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1939)
Sweigard v. Richards
193 A. 188 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
Van Meter v. E. R. Morehouse, Inc.
179 A. 678 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1935)
Sigley v. Marathon Razor Blade Co., Inc.
166 A. 518 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A. 775, 5 N.J. Misc. 178, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-live-poultry-trucking-co-v-schwartz-nj-1927.