New York Life Insurance v. Tedder

153 So. 145, 113 Fla. 649, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1796
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 22, 1933·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judg *650 ment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered', ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield and Buford, J. J., and Ira A. Hutchinson, Circuit Judge, concur.

Brown, J., absent and not participating because of illness'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York Life Insurance v. Tedder, 153 So. 145, 113 Fla. 649, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1796 (Fla. 1933).

153 So. 145 (New York Life Insurance v. Tedder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RLI Ins. Co. v. Collado
678 So. 2d 1313 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Dade County Medical Ass'n v. Samartino
213 So. 2d 627 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Murphy v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
213 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Cassels v. Ideal Farms Drainage District
23 So. 2d 247 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)
Winer v. New York Life Insurance
177 So. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Stonebraker v. Reliance Life Insurance
166 So. 583 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)