New York Life Insurance v. Rabinovitch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

New York Life Insurance v. Rabinovitch

182 A. 380, 320 Pa. 351, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 600

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 3, 1935

DocketAppeals, 475 and 476

StatusPublished

This text of 182 A. 380 (New York Life Insurance v. Rabinovitch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Life Insurance v. Rabinovitch, 182 A. 380, 320 Pa. 351, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 600 (Pa. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is a companion case of the one preceding. It involves another policy for $50,000 on the life of David Rabinovitch, in which Sadie Rabinovitch and Anna Rabinovitch, the appellants, are the beneficiaries. A trial was had before a jury as in the preceding case. In its material features the testimony was the same in this as in the other one. The jury found in favor of the defendants. Thereafter, in an adjudication by Judge Davis sitting as Chancellor, he decided in plaintiff’s favor and ordered the policy cancelled. A final decree to this effect was entered by the court in banc.

The decree is affirmed at the cost of appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is a companion case of the one preceding. It involves another policy for $50,000 on the life of David Rabinovitch, in which Sadie Rabinovitch and Anna Rabinovitch, the appellants, are the beneficiaries. A trial was had before a jury as in the preceding case. In its material features the testimony was the same in this as in the other one. The jury found in favor of the defendants. Thereafter, in an adjudication by Judge Davis sitting as Chancellor, he decided in plaintiff’s favor and ordered the policy cancelled. A final decree to this effect was entered by the court in banc.

The decree is affirmed at the cost of appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 A. 380, 320 Pa. 351, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-life-insurance-v-rabinovitch-pa-1935.