New York Life Insurance v. Mobley

71 S.E. 817, 89 S.C. 189, 1911 S.C. LEXIS 239
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 7, 1911·No. 7951·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydricic.

1 It is error to grant an order staying execution without notice to the adverse party, or his attorney. Code Civ. Proced., 242a.

2 On issuing an injunction, the Court has no power to dispense with an undertaking, with or without sureties, as required by section 243 of the Code. Smith v. Smith, 51 S. C. 379, 29 S. E. 227; Water Co. v. Nunamaker, 73 S. C. 550, 53 S. E. 996.

No point is made and no opinion expressed as to whether this action will lie. But, see Croker v. Allen, 34 S. C. 452, 13 S. E. 650.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York Life Insurance v. Mobley, 71 S.E. 817, 89 S.C. 189, 1911 S.C. LEXIS 239 (S.C. 1911).

71 S.E. 817 (New York Life Insurance v. Mobley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Epps v. BRYANT
62 S.E.2d 832 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1950)