New York Life Insurance v. Kurz

178 So. 2d 873
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in New York Life Insurance v. Kurz. Read the opinion of the Court — 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3136
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 22, 1965·No. No. 33945·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition and cross-petition of Respondent Essie G. Kurz, and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition and the cross-petition are denied and the writ discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, ERVIN and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.

CALDWELL, J., dissents with opinion.

DREW, J., dissents and agrees with CALDWELL, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York Life Insurance v. Kurz, 178 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 1965).

178 So. 2d 873 (New York Life Insurance v. Kurz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.