New York Life Ins. v. Halpern

Third Circuit

New York Life Ins. v. Halpern

61 F.2d 1037, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4570

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedSeptember 30, 1932

DocketNo. 4751

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 F.2d 1037 (New York Life Ins. v. Halpern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Life Ins. v. Halpern, 61 F.2d 1037, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4570 (3d Cir. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed its bill in equity in the court below praying for the cancellation and rescission of two policies of life insurance issued by it in favor of the appellees, Julius Halpern, the insured, and Lillian Hal-pern and Fidelity Tr-ust Company, as trustees under a certain trust agreement, upon the ground that the said Julius Halpern, in Ijiis application, had made certain false and fraudulent answer's to questions propounded to him by the appellant’s medical examiner relating to Hal pern’s health and to his examination by physicians. We have carefully examined the testimony and the briefs of counsel, and the opinion and decree of the learned District Judge [57 F.(2d) 200].

The findings of fact are fully supported by the evidence produced in the court below, and, since we find no error in the conclusions of law, the decree dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed its bill in equity in the court below praying for the cancellation and rescission of two policies of life insurance issued by it in favor of the appellees, Julius Halpern, the insured, and Lillian Hal-pern and Fidelity Tr-ust Company, as trustees under a certain trust agreement, upon the ground that the said Julius Halpern, in Ijiis application, had made certain false and fraudulent answer's to questions propounded to him by the appellant’s medical examiner relating to Hal pern’s health and to his examination by physicians. We have carefully examined the testimony and the briefs of counsel, and the opinion and decree of the learned District Judge [57 F.(2d) 200].

The findings of fact are fully supported by the evidence produced in the court below, and, since we find no error in the conclusions of law, the decree dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 F.2d 1037, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-life-ins-v-halpern-ca3-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack